Unsplash.com: Jason Rosewell |
It
seems extremely "proper" for the conductor to lead the orchestra and
ignore the audience. He (still almost always a he, unfortunately) literally
turns his back to the crowd and focuses on the players.
But when I hear the New York
Philharmonic and the Los Angeles Phil on my local NPR station, their conductors
talk to the audience. It seems friendlier and "less stuffy" to me.
In the VCO (Volunteer Community
Orchestra) I've played in the last several years, the conductor talked to the
audience. Apparently, before I joined, he talked quite a bit, to the point the
Board told him to cut it out. Yes, the conductor was honestly a bit weird and
conversation with him could be "interesting" as his lack of awareness
sometimes led to off-putting comments.
But Jason Heath, in his Double Bass
Blog, tells the story of "The Babbling Conductor." Ouch. Things
were so bad, when a microphone was grabbed, multiple musicians set their
watches to time exactly how long the conductor covers the audience in words
rather than music. The average? 30 minutes. Length of time he talked in one
concert? 45 full minutes. Double ouch.
Does your conductor talk to the
audience? Does he or she do it well, or do you pull out your phone and check
your email? Let me know.
But most important, let me know what
the conductor says and if it helps the concert or hurts it. I'm all for
avoiding mistakes others have made before me.
In my defense, in my real life I have
given many speeches and am pretty good with a microphone. I've been planning
what to talk about during my audition concert, but my goals is to say all the
important stuff in 2-3 minutes per verbal interlulde.
45 minutes of chat from a conductor? It's like you pay for
a concert and a podcast breaks out. Not for me.
Comments
Post a Comment